Here's a table that tells you when data was last updated, and when to expect fresh updates from usgovernmentspending.com.
LAST UPDATED: 05-18-2013
| Mon | Data Type | Last Update + Link | Next Update | ||
| Feb | Federal Spending/Revenue gpoaccess.gov | Feb 2012 | FY13 Budget | Apr 2013 | FY14 Budget |
| Feb | Actual US GDP measuringworth.com | Apr 2012 | 2011 GDP | Apr 2013 | 2012 GDP |
| Feb | Forecast US GDP gpoaccess.gov | Feb 2012 | 2011 ff | Mar 2013 | 2012 ff |
| Mar | Federal Revenue by State irs.gov | Mar 2013 | FY12 data | Mar 2014 | FY13 data |
| June | Actual State GDP bea.gov | June 2012 | 2011 data | June 2013 | 2012 data |
| Jul | State and Local Spending/Revenue census.gov | Sep 2012 | FY10 data | July 2013 | FY11 data |
| Oct | State Quarterly Taxes census.gov | Oct 2012 | FY12 data | Oct 2013 | FY13 data |
| Nov | Federal Spending by State census.gov | Oct 2011 | FY09 data | ??? | FY10 data |
| Dec | State Spending/Revenue census.gov | Dec 2012 | FY11 data | Dec 2013 | FY12 data |
| Dec | US, State Population census.gov | Dec 2012 | 7/12 data | Dec 2013 | 7/13 data |
LAST UPDATED: 05-18-2013
In your next update, you should consider correcting the massive, glaring error in your revenue numbers. You quote them as billions, when in fact they are TRILLIONS, which is 1000 times as much.
ReplyDeleteYour fallacious reporting makes the national debt look 1,000 times worse (as a percent of national income) than it really is. Typical conservative distortions.
He lists it in the thousands of billions. If he listed it in the thousands of trillions then that would be a huge glaring error. Pay attention
DeleteI think the biggest problem with your site is sometimes it tells too much -- I think you need something simpler like an idiot graph spending vs revenue and then you click on the pie to drill down. That would help with dummies like above.
ReplyDeleteAll the best Chris. You're doing a fantabulous job.
Excellent site. A lot of great information. It would be great to provide a map from the CBO data to your data. The summary results are the same but the numbers underneath the summary end up in different places.
ReplyDeleteEveryone which comments anything negative to this site is undoubtedly naive to what I see the purpose of this website (i.e. a simpler and correctly filtered data source) might be a few decimal points or columns in a wrong area (pending what one is trying to do) yet -- this is a great site and applaud Chris for do this.
ReplyDeleteFor what its worth -- I do not consider myself a republican or democrat but simple one who likes to see the facts as one never gets directly in advertised political figures. This site is great for that.
I have just saved a snapshot of the direct revenues to the treasury so I can compare the estimated amount for 2011 to the actual amount when the numbers are available. My guess is that the actual will be far lower. I'm wondering - could you make it possible to create a chart with the estimated vs. actual for the last ten years? Just curious!
ReplyDelete